Cases 71 - 80 of 49,419
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cromar v. Davis County Correctional Facility
as 1:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Paul Kenneth Cromar
Respondent:
Davis County Correctional Facility
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMurtry v. No Named Defendant
as 24-1175
Petitioner:
GREGG PHILIP MCMURTRY
Respondent:
NO NAMED DEFENDANT
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Pacino
as 1:2024cv01110
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson and K. Anonymous
Defendant:
Pacino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veal (PS) v. El Paso County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ray Veal
Defendant:
El Paso County Sheriff's Office, Criminal Justice Center and Well Path Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey (PS) v. McCann et al
as 1:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Zhanda Carey
Defendant:
Beth McCann, Hayley Swestka, Marley Bordovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Williams v. Stancil
as 24-1168
Petitioner:
NORMAN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
