Cases 71 - 80 of 1,006
BUCKINGHAM MANUFACTURING CO., INC. v. BASHLIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2021cv01390
Plaintiff:
BUCKINGHAM MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
Defendant:
BASHLIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION v. KRYO, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01724
Plaintiff:
THE UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Defendant:
KRYO, INC. and EBB THERAPEUTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CS WORKS LLC v. E-GO BIKE LLC
as 1:2021cv00321
Plaintiff:
CS WORKS LLC
Defendant:
E-GO BIKE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
GOLDSMITH v. T.P. ELECTRIC, INC.
as 2:2021cv01297
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GOLDSMITH
Defendant:
T.P. ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
CALLISTER v. EVANS STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
as 2:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
DAN CALLISTER
Defendant:
EVANS STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
DALE v. SAFOCO, INC.
as 1:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON DALE
Defendant:
SAFOCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
MENDOZA v. DORRANCE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC et al.
as 2:2021cv01286
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MENDOZA
Defendant:
DORRANCE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC doing business as ROSEDOG BOOKS doing business as SHEILA DUNN, DORRANCE PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC doing business as ROSEDOG BOOKS and SHEILA DUNN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. HOGAN
as 2:2021cv00885
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
ELENA HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
STEWART v. BOEING CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv00938
Plaintiff:
CHARLES STEWART
Defendant:
BOEING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
SONICBLUE AEROSPACE, INC. v. ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC et al
as 3:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
SONICBLUE AEROSPACE, INC.
Defendant:
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC, ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
