Cases 71 - 80 of 28,063
Brodie v. USA
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Andre M. Brodie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry, Luke Whittaker, Shawn Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Helm v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Helm
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. UofL Health - Louisville, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Cristi Smith
Defendant:
UofL Health - Louisville, Inc. and University Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Kunce v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Tara L. Kunce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mattingly v. Heritage Restaurant Group Holdings, LLC
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Catherine Mattingly
Defendant:
Wendy's International, LLC and Heritage Restaurant Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Poling v. USA
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Randol Allen Poling, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Detective Dylan Cook, Detective Beau Green and Sgt. Matthew Scheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
