Cases 71 - 80 of 20,702
Bush v. Stange
as 6:2024cv03101
Petitioner:
Jordan Bush
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Potter v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Potter
Respondent:
Michelle Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
DaRon Clay
Defendant:
Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Daniel Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harper v. Elsworth et al
as 4:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Lori Elsworth and St. Charles County Department of Correction Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. St. Louis City Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Walton
Defendant:
St. Louis City Police Department, Brandon Wyms and Terron Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Antione Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arita v. USA
as 4:2024cv00249
Petitioner:
Yader J Arita
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hutson v. Vandergriff
as 2:2024cv04051
Petitioner:
Calvin Hutson
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nanney v. Hurst et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Eric Scott Nanney
Defendant:
Emma Hurst, Caroline Moyers, 32nd Division Circuit Court of Bollinger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
