Cases 71 - 80 of 234
Johnson et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00410
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson and David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Coloplast Corp
as 4:2020cv01311
Plaintiff:
Sandra Woods
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarrett v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jarrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01292
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group NV, Wright Medical Group Inc and Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerardot v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01295
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Gerardot
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group NV, Wright Medical Technology Inc and Wright Medical Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carbone et al v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01142
Plaintiff:
Randall A Carbone and Patricia Carbone
Defendant:
Microport Orthopedics Inc, Wright Medical Group NV, Wright Medical Technology Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zaff et al v. Wright Medical Technology Inc
as 4:2020cv01180
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc
Plaintiff:
Sonja Cantu and Gregory Zaff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace et al v. Wright Medical Technology Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01184
Plaintiff:
Marina Haba and Joe Wallace
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thigpen v. CR Bard Inc et al
as 4:2020cv01087
Defendant:
Does 1-10, CR Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Melanie Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rasulallah et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 4:2020cv01143
Defendant:
John Does and Smith & Nephew Inc
Plaintiff:
Barbara Rasulallah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
