Cases 71 - 80 of 10,858
Brown v. Knott et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Mr. Leroy Alexander Brown
Defendant:
Major William Knott, Deputy A. Waldren and Corporal D. Wistrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Texas Thomas Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Richardson v. Robinson et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Chamika Richardson
Defendant:
Louis Robinson, Devon Gwyn, Amani Eisa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fifer et al v. Hollins Estate LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert Fifer and Teresa Fifer
Defendant:
Hollins Estate LLC, EMG German, Haily Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Anderson v. Pollard
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Anderson
Defendant:
Jason Warren Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
