Prison Condition Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 71 - 80 of 7,798
Scott v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Tom Scott
Defendant: Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. McLarin et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant: C McLarin, Webster, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaspard v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Travell Gaspard
Defendant: Warden C Crabtree, Warden Streeter and Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff: Timothy Price
Defendant: Hudson, P Homes, Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Yes-Care We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: Sashim M. Hampton
Defendant: Yes-Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pettaway v. Butler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Marcus Jermaine Pettaway
Defendant: Butler, K. Henderson and Sergent Omega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nix v. Hutton et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: Daric L Nix
Defendant: John Hutton and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shropshire v. Buttram et al
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Tol Shelby Shropshire
Defendant: Dean Buttram, Vernon Ambry, Randle Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: Isiah Davis
Defendant: Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcneal v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff: Andrew Mcneal
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?