Cases 71 - 80 of 20,723
Darden v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darden v. Luechtefeld et al
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Debra Luechtefeld, Kyle Clinkingbeard, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter et al v. Fredrickson et al
as 2:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter and Shirley Carter
Defendant:
Aaron Fredrickson, Terry Helmick and Shelby County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk v. Strid
as 6:2024cv03057
Petitioner:
Andre R Kirk
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. Javois
as 2:2024cv04063
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Laurent Javois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eldridge v. Antonelli
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
David Eldridge
Defendant:
Bryan M. Antonelli, Unknown Mims, Unknown McNear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter et al v. Fredrickson et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter and Shirley Carter
Defendant:
Aaron Fredrickson, Terry Helmick and Shelby County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beil v. Fischer et al
as 4:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
James Beil
Defendant:
Jo Leigh Fischer and Lynn M Stoppy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wry v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wry
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Monica Arcc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
Clarence J. Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
