Cases 71 - 80 of 121
Day et al v. Celadon Trucking Services Inc
as 4:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
Stuart R Day, Stuart R Day, Stuart R Day and others
Defendant:
Celadon Trucking Services Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sidney v. Kent Dobbs Automotive, Inc.
as 5:2008cv05226
Plaintiff:
Kathleen D Sidney
Defendant:
Kent Dobbs Automotive, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hodge v. GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC
as 2:2008cv02065
Plaintiff:
Gloria Hodge
Defendant:
GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2008cv00335
Plaintiff:
Brian Chance Brown, Brian Chance Brown, Brian Chance Brown and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDaniel v. Gates Corporation
as 5:2008cv05066
Plaintiff:
Sharon McDaniel
Defendant:
Gates Corporation, The
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanders et al v. Kohler Company
as 4:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
Leroy Sanders, Leroy Sanders, Leroy Sanders and others
Defendant:
Kohler Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stone v. Wal-Mart Associates Inc et al
as 4:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Billy Stone
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates Inc, Wal-Mart Associates Inc, Wal-Mart Stores East LP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGlothlin v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
as 4:2008cv04008
Plaintiff:
Tony McGlothlin
Defendant:
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Banks v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 2:2007cv02134
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Windstream Corporation et al v. Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
as 4:2007cv01158
Plaintiff:
Windstream Corporation and Windstream Communications Inc
Defendant:
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
