Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,347
James v. Scully We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff: Freddie D. James
Defendant: William E. Scully, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff: Donal R. Edwards
Defendant: Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom-Davis v. State Of Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00257
Petitioner: Eric Vernardo Odom-Davis
Respondent: State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peraita v. Hamm
as 1:2023cv00220
Petitioner: Cuhuatemoc Hinricky Peraita
Respondent: John Q. Hamm
Huey v. Dixon
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff: William Bart Huey
Defendant: Travontay Lee Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Taite v. Westry Robinson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff: Marcus O. Taite
Defendant: Briana Westry Robinson and Insurance Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kitt v. USA
as 1:2023cv00251
Petitioner: Derric Shermaine Kitt
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
James v. Mack
as 1:2023cv00204
Petitioner: Freddie Demetrius James
Respondent: Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Estrada v. USA
as 1:2023cv00239
Petitioner: Victor Manuel Estrada, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Doak v. USA
as 1:2023cv00234
Petitioner: Mack Doak
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?