Cases 71 - 80 of 18,605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maddock v. Michigan House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Matt Maddock
Defendant:
Michigan House of Representatives, Michigan House of Representatives' Business Office, Tabbatha Birmingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sabo Jr v. Honeycutt
as 2:2024cv10491
Plaintiff:
George Frank Sabo Jr
Defendant:
Deputy Brad Honeycutt and Brad Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11174
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller and The City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Dominguez et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Dario Dominguez, Adam Kangas, Tammy Kronschnabel and others
Defendant:
Gogebic County, Lisa Hewitt and Sue Pertile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
