Cases 71 - 80 of 14,383
Hawkins v. Fountain et al
as 5:2024ct03076
Plaintiff:
Justin Hawkins and Justin Antonio Hawkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert Fountain, Chief Fred Robertson, Woodrow David Yancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townes v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2024ct03044
Plaintiff:
Michael Townes
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Lieutenant Eastwood and Officer Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. American Bar Association
as 5:2024ct03047
Plaintiff:
Steven Kelly and Steven James Kelly
Defendant:
American Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Humphrey v. Sarratt
as 5:2024ct03075
Plaintiff:
Trinel Lamont Humphrey
Defendant:
Officer R.A. Sarratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letterlough v. North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02072
Petitioner:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simpler v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02071
Petitioner:
Jimmy Edward Simpler
Respondent:
David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Partin v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02069
Petitioner:
Antwon Devon Partin
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Earp v. USA
as 5:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
Deandre Earp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
