Cases 71 - 80 of 5,983
Crowder et al v. Burress et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Crowder and Diane L. Crowder
Defendant:
Kimberly Burress, Bethany Herman, Gregory Moss, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Mattie Crystal Atkins
Respondent:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pacheco v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Robert Anderson, Shelby Wyatt and Jonathan Call
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cureton v. Unnamed Defendant et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Cureton
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Lower Bed Unit Restrictive Housing Officers, FNU Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00349
Petitioner:
Brandon Gene Massey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lara-Zuniga v. USA
as 3:2024cv00353
Petitioner:
Alberto Manuel Lara-Zuniga
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hardin v. USA
as 3:2024cv00350
Petitioner:
Xavier Twanne Hardin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vassey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Vassey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Dale v. Parsons
as 3:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Dametri Orvil Dale
Respondent:
Micheal Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
