Cases 71 - 80 of 5,925
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Mr. Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Farr
Defendant:
William Marshall, Pruntytown Correctional Center, Psimed Corrections, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Javon Dawson
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dugan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Jeremy Dugan
Respondent:
United States of America and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moats v. Brill et al
as 5:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Rodney Moats
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Brill and Correctional Officer Zachariah Losh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Jamel T. Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dobbs v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Andrivia Frances Wells
Respondent:
Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ravenscroft, Jr. v. Morrisey et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick Morrisey, Office of the Attorney General, Perry J. DeChristopher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellinger v. North Central Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Emanuel Ellinger
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
