Cases 81 - 90 of 242
NADOLNY et al v. UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
as 2:2016cv06113
Plaintiff:
TRICIA NADOLNY and PHILADELPHIA MEDIA NETWORK, PBC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Shaun Rosiere v. USA
as 16-4059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN ROSIERE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THE WOLK LAW FIRM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD
as 2:2016cv05632
Plaintiff:
THE WOLK LAW FIRM , DON GOLDSTEIN and INGRID GOLDSTEIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MCPHAIL v. HARDY, et al
as 1:2016cv00233
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. MCPHAIL
Defendant:
DAVID HARDY and THOMAS D. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BARRETT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 2:2016cv04279
Plaintiff:
DAVID BARRETT
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AMERICAN ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 2:2016cv04283
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ANTI-VIVISECTION SOCIETY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MESSINA LAW FIRM, P.C. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 3:2016cv03554
Plaintiff:
MESSINA LAW FIRM, P.C.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
FARMER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
as 2:2016cv00543
Plaintiff:
JOHN FARMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kevin Conley v. FBI, et al
as 16-1953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN CONLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
RAD v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
as 3:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
