Cases 81 - 90 of 6,148
Sarah Norris v. City of Asheville
as 24-1206
Plaintiff:
SARAH BODDY NORRIS, ABIGAIL TEMOSHCHUK-REYNOLDS, AMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, DEBRA CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Asheville City Manager, D. TYRELL MCGIRT, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Director of the Asheville Parks and Recreation Department and others
Deafueh Monbo v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.
as 24-1292
Plaintiff:
DEAFUEH MONBO and JUAHDI MONBO
Defendant:
UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., HARFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., ESKINDER AFEWORK, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
Michael Moshoures v. City of North Myrtle Beach
as 24-1293
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOSHOURES
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH, MARILYN HATLEY, in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of North Myrtle Beach and DANA CROWELL, in her official capacity as Chief of the North Myrtle Beach Department of Public Safety
Michael Ross v. Bluefield Area Transit
as 24-1295
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSS
Defendant:
BLUEFIELD AREA TRANSIT and JOHN REEVES, General Manager
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Todd Short v. Michael Boyd
as 24-1150
Plaintiff:
TODD W. SHORT
Defendant:
MICHAEL BOYD, FBI Special Agent, in his individual capacity and JOHN DOES, FBI Special Agents 1-6, in their individual capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jay Folse v. John McCuskey, Jr.
as 24-1285
Plaintiff:
JAY FOLSE
Defendant:
JOHN MCCUSKEY, JR., in his official and individual capacities, G. RUSSELL ROLLYSON, JR., in his official and individual capacities and MICHELLE JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
