Cases 81 - 90 of 46,860
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LLOYD v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LLOYD
Defendant:
MANHEIM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER WICZKOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEY v. HEDIGER et al
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM BEY
Defendant:
TERRY HEDIGER and ROBERT KEENAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01974
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOAN DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01963
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and FIRSTRUST BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SIRLIN GALLOGLY & LESSER, PC, BARBARA A. FEIN LAW OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
