Cases 91 - 100 of 1,749
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Brainerd v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brainerd v. Ward, et al
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Lt. Ontravarious, Chief Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Sydnor v. City of Hot Springs, Arkansas et al
as 6:2023cv06081
Plaintiff:
David Sydnor
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs, Arkansas, Harmoney Morrisey, Lt. James Eric Stockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harris v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
as 2:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Bruce Harris
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
