Cases 51 - 60 of 1,742
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Crowson v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv04112
Plaintiff:
Russell Crowson
Defendant:
John Doe, Michael Kramm and City of Texarkana, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattingly v. McCune et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattingly
Defendant:
Judge Marc McCune, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and Public Defender Arron Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Staats v. Tullis et al
as 5:2023cv05195
Plaintiff:
Robert Staats
Defendant:
Sherri Tullis, Julie Haskin, Corporal Drew Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
