Cases 61 - 70 of 844
Maskell v. Harrod
as 1:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David Harrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Judge Bruce Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cleveland et al v. City of Centerton, Arkansas
as 5:2023cv05057
Plaintiff:
Leandra Cleveland and Patrick Cleveland
Defendant:
City of Centerton, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kumm v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2023cv05033
Plaintiff:
Billie Kumm
Defendant:
Deputy Hyrum Wheeler, Deputy Don King, Deputy Tyler Kell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marsh v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 5:2023cv05064
Plaintiff:
Justin Aric Marsh
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Welter et al v. Wilson et al
as 5:2023cv05034
Plaintiff:
Shelby Welter, Dean Welter and Stephanie Hutchins
Defendant:
Detective Janice Wilson and Detective Reid Hudgens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frye et al v. Watson et al
as 6:2023cv06031
Plaintiff:
Andrew Frye and Aleta Frye
Defendant:
Jason Watson, Russell Ussery, Josh Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sutton v. Sevier County et al
as 4:2023cv04018
Plaintiff:
James Sutton
Defendant:
Sevier County, Robert Gentry, Wendell Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Merritt v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv06035
Plaintiff:
Crystal Merritt
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
R.F. v. Roraback et al
as 6:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
R. F.
Defendant:
Daniel Roraback, Tanner Campbell, Shawn Hervey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
