Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,126
DILMORE v. CITY OF QUINCY
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: STACY DILMORE
Defendant: CITY OF QUINCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALTER v. DBNCH CIRCLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: ADRIAN WALTER
Defendant: DBNCH CIRCLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ALVAREZ v. HOME DEPOT USA INC
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: MIGUEL ALVAREZ
Defendant: HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and HOME DEPOT USA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BECK v. ROBERT JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff: SEAN BECK
Defendant: ROBERT JOHNSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF SANTA ROSA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOORER v. PENSACOLA FEDERAL COURT HOUSE
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff: CLEVEN MOORER
Defendant: PENSACOLA FEDERAL COURT HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCARBOROUGH v. GAINEY et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff: Joshua Scarborough
Defendant: Sheriff EMERY GAINEY, Deputy Kaifa Tyson and Deputy Monica Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SHORTER-ARNOLD v. HINSON
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: CHRISSY NOELLE SHORTER ARNOLD and CHRISSY NOELLE SHORTER-ARNOLD
Defendant: ERIC HINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POLLOCK v. GARLAND
as 4:2024cv00158
Plaintiff: DANIC POLLOCK
Defendant: MERRICK B GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: RODRICK HALE
Defendant: RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENZIE v. JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?