Cases 1 - 10 of 1,602
BANKS et al v. BOSWELL et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JALEN BANKS and DONAVAN SANFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS BOSWELL, BOSWELL FARMS ENTERPRISES LLC, BOSWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELLS et al v. MULHOLLAND
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Calvin Dewayne Wells, Belinda Anglon Wells and Kindryn Marie Wells
Defendant:
JOE MULHOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BROWN v. VANDER ZANDEN et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ARMAND RASHAD BROWN
Defendant:
TYLER VANDER ZANDEN, CHRIS HICKS and MATTHEW DELACRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUMANITARIAN v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, JUDGE LESLIE A GARDNER, KATHLEEN LOGSDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STAGGERS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHARRARD STAGGERS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CANDICE BROSE, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
DIXON v. SHIVER et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
JOEY DIXON
Defendant:
BLAKE SHIVER and GEORGIA STATE PATROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USSERY v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
DONALD J USSERY, JR
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA and MARK DANIEL HEBERLIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
