Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 40,783
Gary v. Elkhart County Work Release et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff: Tervarus L Gary
Defendant: Elkhart County Work Release, Board of Directors, Helfan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Mysti Valencia
Defendant: Ron Neal, Jason Nowatzke, Christopher Beal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Swift
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff: Mitch Taebel
Defendant: Taylor Swift and Taylor Alison Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Baker v. Megan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff: Derrick D. Baker
Defendant: Megan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff: Jenifer L. Bowker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified: General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McGruder v. Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00094
Petitioner: Makiyah McGruder
Respondent: Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moorman v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff: Kir Moorman
Defendant: Schmidt, Liaw and Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEZ Corp. v. Cacciato et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff: MEZ Corp.
Defendant: Mathew Cacciato, Frank Cacciato, Katherine Cacciato and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?