Cases 1 - 10 of 1,401
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Feltner v. Kentucky River Regional Authority et al
as 6:2024cv00059
Executor:
Kendra Feltner
Defendant:
Kentucky River Regional Authority, Kentucky River Regional Jail, Inc., Perry County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. United States Penitentiary Big Sandy et al
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
United States Penitentiary Big Sandy, Lt. D. Sibera, Lt. L. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Brown et al
as 5:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
David Kris Hall
Defendant:
Rodney Brown and Derrick Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Green
as 0:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Sumner et al
as 6:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Sanders
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner and Mr. Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amy Robey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goff v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kamron Goff
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
