Cases 1 - 10 of 697
Roshell v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Daryl G. Roshell
Defendant:
Alice Washington, Unknown Roe, Unknown Harold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Harold
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Donaven D. Roach
Defendant:
Unknown Harold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Queen v. Bianton et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Cedirc Queen and Cedric Queen
Defendant:
Rayven Bianton and Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Mel et al
as 3:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Mel, Unknown Johnson and Unknown Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Richard Burnham
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Richard Burnham
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jacob Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Tiffany, Unknown Peridoux and Unknown Staff Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kahoe v. Heemans et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Heemans and Justin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Brandee Butler, Tomeka Robinson and Kalob Jacquet
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary, Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Louisiana Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. 19th Judicial District Court et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Reginald Davis
Defendant:
19th Judicial District Court and Dana Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
