Cases 1 - 10 of 5,659
Wirth et al v. Burton et al
as 0:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Wirth, Jr and Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant:
James Julis Burton, Jane Doe Number 1, Jane Doe Number 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suarez Villa v. United States of America, The
as 0:2024cv01584
Petitioner:
Eduardo Suarez Villa
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brandon v. Sherburne County Sheriff et al
as 0:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Brandon, III
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriff, Joel Brott and Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alhussein v. Elkhart County
as 0:2024cv01552
Plaintiff:
Musab Mohamed Salih Alhussein
Defendant:
Elkhart County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Fritel
as 0:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Roberto A. Williams
Defendant:
Mark Fritel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Debenedetto v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
Gary Debenedetto
Defendant:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. USA
as 0:2024cv01563
Petitioner:
Bryant Duane Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cook v. Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
as 0:2024cv01535
Petitioner:
David James Cook, SR
Respondent:
Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
