Cases 31 - 40 of 84,197
Beginnings and Beyond Counseling v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 0:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
Beginnings and Beyond Counseling individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Play Therapy Minnesota
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hall et al v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al
as 0:2024cv01559
Plaintiff:
Debra Hall and Robyn Russell
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare, Inc., Optum, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lockett v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Keith Lockett
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Glomb v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01556
Plaintiff:
Robert Glomb
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Smith v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01566
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Easterwood v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01553
Plaintiff:
Mark Easterwood
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc
Laurenti v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
George Laurenti
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Portland Hunt-Alpine Club, LLC v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01560
Defendant:
United Sugar Producers & Refiners Cooperative, ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Portland Hunt-Alpine Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv01551
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
