Cases 41 - 50 of 3,195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eason v. City of Senatobia et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Latonya Eason
Defendant:
City of Senatobia, Richard Chandler, Zachary Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Woods v. Berryhill et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Oliver William Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
Colin Berryhill and Southaven Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eisenbraun v. Tidwell et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Joseph Eisenbraun
Defendant:
James Tidwell and Trevor Blocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flowers v. Greenwood Leflore Consolidated School District, Mississippi et al
as 4:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shaunteria Flowers
Defendant:
Greenwood Leflore Consolidated School District, Mississippi and Samantha Milton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dymon Moore and Gassey Williams
Defendant:
The City of Columbus and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McPhail v. Lynchard
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Beau McPhail
Defendant:
Percy L. Lynchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
