Cases 41 - 50 of 50,985
Cross v. USA
as 4:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
Timothy Cross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. Psychiatrist et al
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Unknown Psychiatrist, Barnes Jewish Psychiatric Care Unit and Barnes Jewish Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hong Kong Ryosan Limited v. Digital Concepts of Missouri, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Hong Kong Ryosan Limited
Defendant:
Digital Concepts of Missouri, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wolf v. Kologik LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Robert P Wolf
Defendant:
KOLOGIK, LLC and WALTER A MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ribas v. Besler
as 4:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Victor Manuel Ribas
Defendant:
Megan Besler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Davidson v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 4:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Brown
as 4:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Omar T. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenden Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lewis
Defendant:
American Family Insurance Company and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
