Cases 91 - 100 of 6,359
Keys v. Walmart Corp.
as 4:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Walmart Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Ameren Electric
as 4:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Ameren Electric
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berry v. Missouri Department of Corrections Women's Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Corrections Center
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Dawn Berry
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections Women's Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Corrections Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. The City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lamar Allan Johnson
Defendant:
The City of St. Louis, Missouri, Joseph Nickerson, Clyde Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shire v. Stobie
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Marie Dean, Brooke J. Marr, Justin E. Shire and others
Defendant:
Laura Hawk Stobie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Troupe v. Morgan et al
as 4:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Tashonda Troupe
Defendant:
Daniel J. Morgan and Jordan Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
