Cases 111 - 120 of 5,675
Hendrix v. Sims et al
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Martin D Hendrix
Defendant:
Deputy Ryland T Sims, Deputy A. Quick and Ray County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hargrove v. Bach Team, LLC
as 4:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
Courtney Hargrove
Defendant:
Bach Team, LLC and Bach Team, LLC doing business as Foursite Property Management doing business as Steeplechase Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Kirk v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirk
Defendant:
City of St. Joseph, Missouri, John Josendale, Marty Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hollis v. Aimbridge Hospitality et al
as 4:2023cv00917
Plaintiff:
Amir Hollis
Defendant:
Aimbridge Hospitality Holding, Aimbridge Hospitality, Hotel Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
