Cases 61 - 70 of 2,981
Phillips v. Drago et al
as 4:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Ryan Drago and Carlos Phillips
Defendant:
City of St. Louis and Ryan J. Drago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpenter v. Westin Hotel et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Charles Carpenter
Defendant:
Westin Hotel, Alida Poston, Latrina Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Austell v. City of Pagedale
as 4:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Austell
Defendant:
City of Pagedale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saali v. Walmart
as 4:2023cv01499
Plaintiff:
Christina Saali
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dunbar v. Midland States Bancorp, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Dunbar
Defendant:
Midland States Bancorp, Inc. doing business as Midland States Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
City of Chesterfield v. Rosa
as 4:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
City of Chesterfield
Defendant:
Kenneth Rosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McNeal v. Calvin et al
as 4:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal, Esq.
Defendant:
Vera L. Calvin, Anthony T. Lofties, Joann A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Duncan v. Wells
as 4:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Duncan
Defendant:
Alan Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garmon v. City of Northwoods, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Charles Garmon
Defendant:
City of Northwoods, Missouri, Samuel Davis and Michael Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pennington et al v. Hefner et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bryan O Pennington, Tylla Pennington, B.P., 2 and others
Defendant:
Carl Hefner, Stoddard County, Rodger Seal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
