Cases 11 - 20 of 6,803
Tisdale v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Tisdale
Defendant:
City of St. Louis and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElroy v. Beadles et al
as 6:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Raymond Glenn McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles and James Arnott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Koch v. St. Louis City Police Dept et al
as 4:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Christopher Koch
Defendant:
St. Louis City Police Dept and St. Louis Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shores v. Morris
as 4:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Andrew Shores
Defendant:
Donna Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bracken v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Garvester Bracken
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Calea Stovall-Reid and Joan L. Moriarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNealy v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Matthew McNealy
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah and Jaclyn Rattler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leist v. Griffin et al
as 4:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Zachery Leist
Defendant:
Tyler Griffin, C. James and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Loreen Armstrong, Unknown Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Vandergriff et al
as 4:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Robbie Robertson
Defendant:
Teri Vandergriff, Co. Unknown Aubuchon and Co. Unknown Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
