Cases 31 - 40 of 19,610
OLMA v. TOWNSHIP OF PLAINSBORO et al
as 3:2024cv05654
Plaintiff:
BRETT J. OLMA
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PLAINSBORO, MAYOR PETER A. CANTU, ADMINISTRATOR ANTHONY CANCRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINCKNEY v. HONORABLE ROBERT G. WILSON et al
as 3:2024cv05682
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Defendant:
HONORABLE ROBERT G. WILSON and SOMERSET SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
1453 FREID AVENUE LLC v. BOROUGH OF WOODBINE
as 1:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
1453 FREID AVENUE LLC
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WOODBINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PARSONS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2024cv05615
Plaintiff:
DEVIN PARSONS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTION OFFICER MELISSA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05642
Plaintiff:
DAMON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
