Cases 51 - 60 of 2,328
Guzman-Cabrera v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv17483
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Guzman-Cabrera
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERV., U.S. Dist Court, Southern District of New York and others
Palmer v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv11721
Defendant:
CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, PHIL MURPHY, United States Marhals Serv. and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIDDLEBROOKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv09225
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERV. and others
Plaintiff:
Lado Middlebrooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinaldo v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv10595
Defendant:
U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, Director of Metropolitan Corr. Center, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Reinaldo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv09897
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CAPTAIN J. MILLER, MOHAMED MOAHAREK and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF WILKINS CASADO et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv02108
Defendant:
JANE & JOHN DOE NURSES 1-10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10, MIDDLESEX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
JUNIOR HOLGUIN and ESTATE OF WILKINS CASADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH et al v. HICKS et al
as 3:2019cv16509
Defendant:
MR. M. SLAUGHTER, SARGENT EURE, OFFICER ING. and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE SMITH, AJAI SMITH, MR. CHAPPELL T. FLADGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BRYANT v. HICKS et al
as 2:2019cv16618
Defendant:
MARCUS HICKS, MICHELLE RICCI, CALVIN SPIRES and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2018cv14641
Plaintiff:
LUIS G. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
