Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Cases 91 - 100 of 5,380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00123
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Doe #021 v. Lee, et al.
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff: John Doe #021
Defendant: Governor William B Lee, Director David B. Rausch, William B Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe #026 v. William Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: John Doe #026
Defendant: William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #030 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: John Doe #030
Defendant: William - Lee, David B. Rausch and William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #027 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: John Doe #027
Defendant: William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?