Cases 71 - 80 of 5,380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Boyd v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Lacora S Boyd
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Carol A Smith, Erika Kinney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe #051 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
John Doe #051
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tennessee Hills Distillery, LLC v. Town of Jonesborough et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Hills Distillery, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Jonesborough, Charles Vest, Virginia Causey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Russell Brooks
Defendant:
Bill Lee and David Roush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardiman v. McConnell et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cory Dustin Hardiman
Defendant:
Sheriff Joyce McConnell, Vicky Afisov, Sandy Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
