Cases 71 - 80 of 13,477
Smith v. McFarlin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Patrick McFarlin, Sheriff Hodges and Q.C.H.C. Medical Company/Entity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swann v. Barrong et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Swann
Defendant:
James Barrong and Chief Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. LNU et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle LNU and Monica Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance et al v. Nance et al
as 1:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Barry Thomas Nance and O'leisha Nance
Defendant:
Leslie Nance, Keeon Nance, Bells Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollis v. Holloway et al
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Horace Hollis
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Eugene Lewis, Cpl. f/n/u White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rausch
as 2:2024cv02228
Plaintiff:
Michelle P. Hill
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Corey Demoris Gilbert
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Churchwell v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Lavonta Churchwell
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Angelos Washington
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, The, Tennessee Department of Correction, Bledsoe County Correction Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Cobb
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
