Cases 81 - 90 of 17,557
Barnes v. Athens
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Denise Barnes
Defendant:
City of Athens and City of Athens, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe #059 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
John Doe #059
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Nettles v. State of Tennessee Government et al
as 2:2024cv02241
Plaintiff:
Doris Ann Nettles
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Government, Melanie Taylor Jefferson d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee, Joedae L. Jenkins d/b/a Chancellor of the Chancery Court of Shelby County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe (HWB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
John Doe (HWB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Marcia Jordan
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Doe #60 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Doe #60
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacy v. Clarksville Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Dylan Stacy
Defendant:
Clarksville Police Department, City of Clarksville and Jamal Alquzweeni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
