Cases 11 - 20 of 3,558
Jupp v. Ferguson
as 2:2024cv00127
Petitioner:
Eugene Alec Jupp
Respondent:
Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barragan Jr v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Francisco Barragan Jr
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Mott et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Carrie Ash Mott, John Doe, The Joint Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Eastern State Hospital
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital and Eric Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reynoso v. Welch et al
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Jose Reynoso
Defendant:
Welch, Joseph Brusic and Lisa Rapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bodhi v. Strange et al
as 4:2024cv05039
Plaintiff:
Bodhi
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Lisa Flynn, Dawn Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bone v. Yakima County Department of Corrections Food Services et al
as 1:2024cv03052
Plaintiff:
Broderick J Bone
Defendant:
Yakima County Department of Corrections Food Services and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
