General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,460
Brown'el v. Brock et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff: Dion Brown'el
Defendant: Daniel C Brock, Phillip E Miller and Clayton Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Michael Jenkins
Defendant: Dexter Payne and Gleenover Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Toby E Carter
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElroy v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Jerel McElroy
Defendant: Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Crawford v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Correy Crawford
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Travis Parks
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Lynn Watkins
Defendant: Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Shane Michael Brown
Defendant: Doe and C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Conley v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Gary L Conley
Defendant: James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortega v. Payne We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Francisco Raul Ortega
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?