Cases 1 - 10 of 844
Martinez v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Joanie E. Martinez
Defendant:
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, Postmaster Leon Lane, Jr. and Supervisor Baxter 'Bud' Lofland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Dudley v. State of Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Karanya Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, State Trooper Jacob Meadows and State of Arkansas Headquarters Troop 6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jefferey Wayne Phillips, Carol Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Reider et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Mayor David Reider, Chief of Police Jeff Ross, Sergeant Jonia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Shook et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Captain Jacob Shook, Lieutenant Samantha Smith, Emily Hanuska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Orion Parks
Defendant:
Officer Shawn Taylor, Judge Mike Medlock, Jeremiah Corbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Wagnon
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Cindy Wagnon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Titus v. Harris et al
as 6:2024cv06044
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and Iamsui
Defendant:
Rapper T.I. Harris, Elon Musk, Beauty and the Beast (the movie) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Titus v. Rihanna, et al
as 6:2024cv06045
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and Iamsui
Defendant:
Rihanna, Nikki Minaj, Eminem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vicentic v. City of Hot Springs
as 6:2024cv06042
Plaintiff:
Dragan Vicentic
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
