Cases 41 - 50 of 12,256
Wintrode v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Anita M.E. Moore, Pierre Carnesi, Craig Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amaral, et al. v. Post Falls Highway District
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Susan Amaral and Shane P Amaral
Defendant:
Post Falls Highway District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Social Security Commissioner
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Denise Virginia Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scholz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Clarenda A. Scholz
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ray v. F.B.O.P
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Ray
Respondent:
F.B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Munden et al v. Bannock County
as 4:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Munden, Sherrilyn L Munden and Coyote Creek Ranch, LLC
Defendant:
Bannock County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quinones v. Ponting, et al.
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Becky Ponting and Hanly Ponting
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Kelly D Davis, Jason Davis and Alliance Title Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. Meskin
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Quinones
Defendant:
Richard Meskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Blue Knight Holdings, LLC, et al.
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mandy Rose Casey
Defendant:
Blue Knight Holdings, LLC, Blue Knight Security, LLC, Caribou County Idaho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
