Cases 1 - 10 of 76,881
Goldsmith v. MedStar Health, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Tina Goldsmith
Defendant:
MedStar Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Shin v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Gloria H. Shin
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Color of law agent (including Municipalities) Jane and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SAKHI et al v. Schofer et al
as 1:2024cv01376
Plaintiff:
SARAH OBIDULAH SAKHI and HAMED AREFI
Defendant:
DEPUTY CHIEF Andrew Schofer, SECRETARY ANTONY J BLINKEN, ASST. SECRETARY RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Sanders v. MedStar Health, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
Tracy Sanders
Defendant:
MedStar Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Burns Architectural Products v. Peerless Products, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
Burns Architectural Products
Defendant:
Peerless Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
LPUSA, LLC v. Wheelz Up Garage, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
LPUSA, LLC
Defendant:
Wheelz Up Garage, Inc. and Wheelz Up, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Gonzalez v. Snyder et al
as 1:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gonzalez
Defendant:
David Snyder and Roland Sorge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
