Cases 101 - 110 of 2,240
Harris v. Rare Hospitalilty International, Inc.
as 6:2023cv03189
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Harris
Defendant:
Rare Hospitalilty International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bruce v. City of Springfield, Missouri
as 6:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bruce
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClanahan v. Yellen
as 4:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
DaJuan McClanahan
Defendant:
Janet L Yellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Spradling v. Ezard Elementary School et al
as 6:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
Wanda Spradling
Defendant:
Ezard Elementary School and Laclede County R-1 Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Israel v. Maysville R-1 School District et al
as 5:2023cv06074
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jamie J. Israel
Defendant:
Maysville R-1 School District, Mr. Chris Heslinga and Chris Heslinga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KS et al v. Lexington R-V School District et al
as 4:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
KS
Defendant:
Lexington R-V School District and Lexington R-V High School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
K S and Christie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vanegas v. S.D.I. of Versailles et al
as 2:2023cv04117
Plaintiff:
Autumn Vanegas
Defendant:
S.D.I. of Versailles, S.D.I. of Versailles, LLC doing business as Sonic Drive-In and Edward Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chinnery v. Bailey
as 2:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Chinnery
Defendant:
Andrew T. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curless v. Evergy Metro, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M Curless
Defendant:
Evergy Metro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
