Cases 1 - 10 of 32,327
Hudson Valley Fish Farm, Inc. v. Go Fish Co., NYC Corp.
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Hudson Valley Fish Farm, Inc.
Defendant:
Go Fish Co., NYC Corp.
Landry v. Deputy John Doe
as 5:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Monica Landry
Defendant:
Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Jared William Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lettieri v. Lovric
as 9:2024cv00609
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Miroslav Lovric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fallon et al v. Greater Syracuse Moving & Storage Co., Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Michael Fallon and Paula Fallon
Defendant:
Greater Syracuse Moving & Storage Co., Inc. and North American Van Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Morinville v. Upstate Correctional Facility RRU et al
as 9:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Carlos Morinville
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility RRU, Doe #1, Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Peter John Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johns v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Alvie Johns
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kopp v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Kopp
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
