Cases 71 - 80 of 7,259
Stinson v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Mark Yates, Wall & Associates, Inc., John P. Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dalton v. Fisk et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Dalton
Defendant:
John Fisk and Centurion Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agins v. Madison County Jail
as 1:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Ahmeada Agins
Defendant:
Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dimmett v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02062
Petitioner:
Cody Dimmett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hudson v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02072
Petitioner:
Melvin Hudson
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Onyiego v. Wardlow
as 2:2024cv02073
Petitioner:
Justus Onyiego
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Wardlow et al
as 1:2024cv01028
Plaintiff:
Curtis Taylor
Defendant:
Jerry Wardlow, Purtle, Olsburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Pounds
as 2:2024cv02053
Petitioner:
Jessie Dotson
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tims v. Shelby Co. Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
William Tims
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Detention Center, Sgt. Felts, Racardo Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Webb
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Jeffery Smith, Jackie Bausman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
