Other Civil Rights Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,743
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff: New Muslim Party
Defendant: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colbaugh v. Meigs County et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff: Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Defendant: Meigs County, Meigs County Sheriff's Department, Robert Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Wayne Burgess
Defendant: City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Postles v. Courtner
as 1:2024cv01081
Plaintiff: Johnny Justin Postles
Defendant: Matthew Robert Courtner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Welch v. United Network for Organ Sharing et al
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff: Dexter Welch
Defendant: United Network for Organ Sharing and Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00414
Plaintiff: Nakomis Jones
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewin v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00418
Plaintiff: Tywaska Ewin
Defendant: The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Graham III v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff: Frank Graham III
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dionne v. Del Toro
as 2:2024cv02222
Plaintiff: Christopher Dionne
Defendant: Carlos Del Toro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Burrell
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff: Joseph Edwards
Defendant: Mallory Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?