Cases 41 - 50 of 6,297
Hall v. Key et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Hall
Defendant:
John Key and Wesley Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. USA
as 1:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Garrian King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hulse v. USA
as 2:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Joseph Hulse
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carrier v. Rymer et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Brandon Carrier
Defendant:
Jim Rymer and Matt Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Phillips
as 4:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Emmanuel Bibb Houston
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips and Herbert Slatery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liles v. Bledsoe County Correctional Complex
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Liles
Defendant:
Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Medical Department, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex - Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morley v. Patterson et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jacob Morley
Defendant:
Matt Patterson, Jon Dula, Mitzia Waddill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Malik Scott
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blevins v. Ellers et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Bryan S Blevins
Defendant:
Brian Ellers and Aaron White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024mc00018
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
