Cases 51 - 60 of 1,049
Abdelnabi v. Clendenion
as 3:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
Nehad S Abdelnabi
Respondent:
Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Vantell (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Respondent:
Vincent Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Clendenion
as 1:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Franklin Sean Smith
Respondent:
Jason Clendenion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. Hancock County Jail et al (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Martin Ray Rouse
Respondent:
Hancock County Jail and Brad Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. Hancock County Sheriff Department (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Marty Ray Rouse
Respondent:
Hancock County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swann v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Blake O'bryan Swann
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mullins v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023mc00018
Petitioner:
Charles Daniel Mullins
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Byrd v. Fitz
as 3:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
George John Byrd
Respondent:
State of TN, Dept of Corrections and Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lawson
as 2:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Respondent:
Russell Washburn and Ronnie Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Eller
as 3:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
Jamarcus Jackson
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
